Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 30(3): 181-184, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34591010

RESUMO

Research has demonstrated similar efficacy of drill epiphysiodesis and percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws for the management of adolescent leg length discrepancy. A cost analysis was performed to determine which procedure is more cost-effective. Patients seen for epiphysiodesis of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia and fibula between 2004 and 2017 were reviewed. A decision analysis model was used to compare costs. Two hundred thirty-five patients who underwent either drill (155/235, 66%) or screw (80/235, 34%) epiphysiodesis were analyzed with an average age at initial procedure of 13 years (range, 8.4 to 16.7 years). There was no significant difference in average initial procedure cost or total cost of all procedures across treatment groups (n = 184). The cost difference between drill and screw epiphysiodesis is minimal. In order for screw epiphysiodesis to be cost-favored, there would need to be a significant decrease in its cost or complication rate. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):181-184, 2021).


Assuntos
Epífises , Perna (Membro) , Adolescente , Artrodese , Parafusos Ósseos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Epífises/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia/cirurgia
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 41(6): 385-388, 2021 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric orthopaedic fellowship directors (FDs) have a valuable impact on the education of trainees and future leaders in the field. There is currently no research on the characteristics of pediatric orthopaedic FDs. METHODS: Programs were identified using the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America fellowship directory. Operative, nonoperative, and specialty programs were included. Data was collected through Qualtrics survey, e-mail, telephone, and online searches. Variables included demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), Hirsch index (h-index) as a measure of research productivity, graduate education, residency and fellowship training, years of hire at current institution and as FD, and leadership roles. RESULTS: Fifty-five FDs were identified. The majority (49/55, 89%) were male and 77% (27/35) were Caucasian. The mean age at survey was 51.1±8.2 years. The mean h-index was 17.2. Older age correlated with higher h-index (r=0.48, P=0.0002). The average duration from fellowship graduation to FD appointment was 9.6±6.7 and 6.9±6.1 years from institutional hire. Sixteen FDs (29%) had additional graduate level degrees. Almost all (52/55, 95%) FDs completed orthopaedic surgery residencies and all graduated fellowship training. Twenty-nine percent (16/55) completed more than 1 fellowship. Most FDs (51/55, 93%) completed a fellowship in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. Ten FDs (18%) completed pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowships that included spine-specific training. One-third of all current FDs were fellowship-trained at either Boston Children's Hospital (9/55, 16%) or Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (9/55, 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric orthopaedic FDs are typically early-career to mid-career when appointed, with a strong research background. Nearly a third completed additional graduate degrees or multiple fellowships. Although male dominated, there are more female FDs leading pediatric orthopaedic programs compared with adult reconstruction, trauma, and spine fellowships. As fellowships continue to grow and diversify, this research will provide a baseline to determine changes in FD leadership.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Liderança , Ortopedia/educação , Pediatria/educação , Diretores Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 30(2): 174-179, 2021 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371652

RESUMO

A 2012 publication regarding the surgical management of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures (PLHCF) found that leaving pins exposed produced an average savings of $3442 per patient compared to burying pins, with fewer complications. The primary objective of this present study was to determine the impact of this cost analysis on surgeons' treatment preferences at the same hospital. The secondary aim was to verify that leaving pins exposed continued to be a cost-effective and safe treatment strategy. We reviewed all PLHCF treated with open reduction and internal fixation at our institution between 2004 and 2017. The Clavien-Dindo Classification was used to grade complications. Variations in treatment course were evaluated using a chi-squared test to compare the proportions of buried and exposed pins, pre- and postcost analysis report publication. Two hundred forty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 5.9 years (range 1-12 years). In 174 (70%) cases, the pins were buried and in the remaining 30% the pins were exposed. Between 2004 and 2012, the majority of pins were buried (90%) compared to between 2013 and 2017, when the majority of pins were exposed (62%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference detected in complication rate (P = 0.75) or complication severity (P = 0.61) across groups. The demonstrated cost-effectiveness of exposing the pins in the treatment of PLHCF has had a statistically significant impact on surgeon behavior at our institution. Publishing cost analysis research can change physician practice to improve quality, safety and value of care delivery.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Cirurgiões , Pinos Ortopédicos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero , Lactente
4.
World J Orthop ; 7(7): 406-17, 2016 Jul 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27458551

RESUMO

The last two decades have seen continuous advances in prenatal ultrasonography and in utero magnetic resonance imaging. These technologies have increasingly enabled the identification of various spinal pathologies during early stages of gestation. The purpose of this paper is to review the range of fetal spine anomalies and their management, with the goal of improving the clinician's ability to counsel expectant parents prenatally.

5.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(8): 821-828, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26090976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and cost variations between uniplanar (UNI) and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) external fixation for unstable pediatric tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODS: We performed an IRB approved, retrospective review of 44 diaphyseal tibial fractures in 42 children treated with external fixation (16 TSF and 28 UNI) between 2003 and 2011, at a single level 1 pediatric trauma center. Data on demographic, clinical, radiographic, treatment cost, and complication differences were analyzed between the 2 groups. The Student t tests, Fisher's exact tests, χ trend tests, logistic regression, and a cost analysis comparison was used to assess the differences. RESULTS: The mean age in both groups was 13 years (range: 6 to 18 y TSF, 9 to 17 y UNI). The mean follow-up was 8 months (TSF) and 13 months (UNI). According to the AO classification, there were 28 type A, 13 type B, and 3 type C fractures with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.69). Total time in the fixator was not different between the 2 groups (UNI 14 wk, TSF 12 wk, P=0.10), but time to union was less in the TSF group (UNI 16 wk, TSF 13 wk, P<0.01). There were no differences in the final radiographic alignment between the groups. The UNI group experienced more complications (7 pin-site infections and 9 reoperations) compared with 4 pin-site infections and 2 reoperations in the TSF group. A cost analysis revealed significant differences in equipment cost (UNI frame=$5074 vs. TSF frame=$10,675; P<0.0001); however, after corrected cost analysis with calculated return to the operating room for complications, there was no difference in cost of treatment (UNI treatment=$20,113 vs. TSF treatment=$19,138). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an initial equipment cost difference between UNI and TSF frames, corrected cost analysis reveals equivalent costs for care delivery. Therefore, TSF can be considered as a cost-conscious device for the treatment of unstable pediatric tibial diaphyseal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative cohort study.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia/lesões , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(4): 429-32, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25851674

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A dramatic increase in the number of pediatric orthopaedic fellows being trained has led to concerns that there may be an oversupply of pediatric orthopaedists. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this perception is accurate and whether the practice expectations of recent pediatric fellowship graduates are being met by surveying recent pediatric fellowship graduates about their early practice experiences. METHODS: A 36-question survey approved by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) leadership was electronically distributed to 120 recent graduates of pediatric orthopaedic fellowships; 81 responses were ultimately obtained (67.5% response rate). RESULTS: Almost all (91%) of the respondents were very or extremely satisfied with their fellowship experience. Half of the respondents had at least 1 job offer before they entered their fellowships. After completion of fellowships, 35% received 1 job offer and 62.5% received ≥2 job offers; only 2.5% did not receive a job offer. Most reported a practice consisting almost entirely of pediatric orthopaedics, and 93.5% thought this was in line with their expectations; 87% indicated satisfaction with their current volume of pediatric orthopaedics, and 85% with the complexity of their pediatric orthopaedic cases. Despite the high employment percentages and satisfaction with practice profiles, nearly a third (28%) of respondents replied that too many pediatric orthopaedists are being trained. CONCLUSIONS: Positive messages from this survey include the satisfaction of graduates with their fellowship training, the high percentage of graduates who readily found employment, and the satisfaction of graduates with their current practice environments; this indicates that the pediatric orthopaedic job environment is not completely saturated and there are continued opportunities for graduating pediatric fellows despite the increased number of fellows being trained. Although not determined by this study, it may be that the stable demand for pediatric orthopaedic services is being driven by the expansion of the scope of practice as well as subspecialization within the practice of pediatric orthopaedics.


Assuntos
Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/educação , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/educação , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Candidatura a Emprego , Satisfação no Emprego , América do Norte , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/provisão & distribuição , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras/provisão & distribuição , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 33(5): 471-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23752142

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perioperative surgical site infection (SSI) after pediatric spine fusion is a recognized complication with rates between 0.5% and 1.6% in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and up to 22% in "high risk" patients. Significant variation in the approach to infection prophylaxis has been well documented. The purpose of this initiative is to develop a consensus-based "Best Practice" Guideline (BPG), informed by both the available evidence in the literature and expert opinion, for high-risk pediatric patients undergoing spine fusion. For the purpose of this effort, high risk was defined as anything other than a primary fusion in a patient with idiopathic scoliosis without significant comorbidities. The ultimate goal of this initiative is to decrease the wide variability in SSI prevention strategies in this area, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced health care costs. METHODS: An expert panel composed of 20 pediatric spine surgeons and 3 infectious disease specialists from North America, selected for their extensive experience in the field of pediatric spine surgery, was developed. Using the Delphi process and iterative rounds using a nominal group technique, participants in this panel were as follows: (1) surveyed for current practices; (2) presented with a detailed systematic review of the relevant literature; (3) given the opportunity to voice opinion collectively; and (4) asked to vote regarding preferences privately. Round 1 was conducted using an electronic survey. Initial results were compiled and discussed face-to-face. Round 2 was conducted using the Audience Response System, allowing participants to vote for (strongly support or support) or against inclusion of each intervention. Agreement >80% was considered consensus. Interventions without consensus were discussed and revised, if feasible. Repeat voting for consensus was performed. RESULTS: Consensus was reached to support 14 SSI prevention strategies and all participants agreed to implement the BPG in their practices. All agreed to participate in further studies assessing implementation and effectiveness of the BPG. The final consensus driven BPG for high-risk pediatric spine surgery patients includes: (1) patients should have a chlorhexidine skin wash the night before surgery; (2) patients should have preoperative urine cultures obtained; (3) patients should receive a preoperative Patient Education Sheet; (4) patients should have a preoperative nutritional assessment; (5) if removing hair, clipping is preferred to shaving; (6) patients should receive perioperative intravenous cefazolin; (7) patients should receive perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for gram-negative bacilli; (8) adherence to perioperative antimicrobial regimens should be monitored; (9) operating room access should be limited during scoliosis surgery (whenever practical); (10) UV lights need NOT be used in the operating room; (11) patients should have intraoperative wound irrigation; (12) vancomycin powder should be used in the bone graft and/or the surgical site; (13) impervious dressings are preferred postoperatively; (14) postoperative dressing changes should be minimized before discharge to the extent possible. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we present a consensus-based BPG consisting of 14 recommendations for the prevention of SSIs after spine surgery in high-risk pediatric patients. This can serve as a tool to reduce the variability in practice in this area and help guide research priorities in the future. Pending such data, it is the unsubstantiated opinion of the authors of the current paper that adherence to recommendations in the BPG will not only decrease variability in practice but also result in fewer SSI in high-risk children undergoing spinal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Criança , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Escoliose/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA